Care Plan Design and Harmonization: A Deep Dive

1. Introduction: The Imperative of Comprehensive, Harmonized Care Plans

Modern healthcare is increasingly complex, with patients often navigating a web of specialists, care settings, and treatment modalities. This complexity frequently leads to fragmented care, where silos of information hinder effective communication and coordination among providers. Patients can become lost in this maze – unsure of their care pathways, the reasons for referrals, or the steps needed for follow-up after a specialist visit. Such lack of coordination not only diminishes quality of care but also contributes to inefficiencies and higher costs. Addressing these challenges requires a fundamental shift toward more integrated, patient-centered approaches, with comprehensive and harmonized care plans serving as a cornerstone of effective delivery.

In the United States, frameworks like the Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) model, defined by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), embody this shift by emphasizing five core functions of primary care: comprehensive care, patient-centeredness, coordinated care, accessible services, and a commitment to quality and safety . At the heart of the PCMH is a well-formed care plan addressing the entirety of a patient’s needs (physical and mental) and actively engaging the patient as a partner. Patients are not passive recipients of care; they are active collaborators who should have ownership of their care plans and be fully informed participants in decision-making . This ethos aligns with global perspectives as well. For example, the World Health Organization’s Integrated People-Centred Health Services framework calls for health systems “designed for people”, providing services “coordinated around their needs” and respectful of their preferences . Likewise, healthcare systems abroad (such as the NHS in the UK) stress personalised care and support planning as a means to improve outcomes, tackle inequalities, and make the best use of resources .

A comprehensive, harmonized care plan benefits all stakeholders in the healthcare ecosystem. Providers gain a complete, up-to-date picture of the patient, enabling better clinical decisions and reducing duplicate efforts. Patients and their families receive clear guidance on their health journey, understand their goals and treatments, and feel empowered in their care – factors linked to higher engagement and adherence . Caregivers are included with defined roles and access to information, so they can effectively support the patient. Payers (insurers and health plans) see improved care coordination leading to fewer avoidable complications (for example, comprehensive care planning has been shown to reduce hospital readmissions and even mortality in chronic disease management ), aligning with value-based care incentives. Community organizations and social services can be connected through the care plan to address social needs, thereby contributing resources that improve overall outcomes. In short, when done well, an integrated care plan serves as a “single source of truth” for everyone involved in a patient’s care.

Vinyl Health is a platform tackling one of the most urgent problems in healthcare today: fragmentation of care. By focusing on truly harmonized care plans, the platform unifies the often-disconnected pieces of a patient’s health journey into a clear, cohesive narrative. At the heart of this effort is a commitment to delivering care plans that are not only clinically accurate but also clear, accessible, and actionable – and doing so in real time. This speaks not only to the quality of information but also to the strength of the technology delivering it. To build such a system, it’s essential to understand what makes a care plan both clinically robust and genuinely patient-centered. This report lays that foundation, analyzing and refining the core components needed to support care plans that empower patients and enable seamless collaboration across the healthcare ecosystem. It reflects current best practices and standards in the U.S. (e.g. AHRQ, CMS, NCQA PCMH) while acknowledging international principles of integrated, people-centered care. Throughout, we will also highlight examples of digital tools innovating in care plan harmonization (e.g. Epic’s Care Everywhere, Bamboo Health, AlayaCare) and identify gaps where further innovation is needed to advance patient-centered care, operational efficiency, and clinical outcomes.

2. Deconstructing the Foundational Elements of a Care Plan

A robust and effective care plan begins with a strong foundation of information that identifies the patient and provides a comprehensive overview of their current health status and relevant history. Two initial categories – Foundational & Demographic Information and Comprehensive Assessment & Problem Identification – form this crucial base.

2.1 Foundational & Demographic Information

Accurate, standardized foundational and demographic information is the cornerstone of any well-formed care plan. This data ensures that the right information is associated with the correct patient across all healthcare interactions and facilitates seamless communication among the care team (and with the patient). Key elements in this category include:

  • Patient Identification: The patient’s full name, date of birth, and a unique identifier (such as a medical record number) must be recorded. These details are fundamental for accurate record-keeping and linking patient information across disparate systems – essential for harmonization. Consistent identifiers help avoid mix-ups and ensure that, for example, lab results or consult notes match the correct person.
  • Current Contact Information: The patient’s address, phone number(s), and email address are vital for communication about appointments, follow-ups, and real-time updates to the care plan. In a coordinated system, up-to-date contact info enables timely reminders and notifications (e.g. via patient portal or messaging) so that nothing falls through the cracks.
  • Preferred Language and Communication Needs: Documenting the patient’s preferred language and any special communication requirements (e.g. need for an interpreter, hearing or vision accommodations) ensures that all communication is accessible and patient-centered. This supports equity and understanding – a care plan isn’t useful if the patient can’t comprehend it. Providing materials in the patient’s language or in large print, for example, can greatly enhance engagement.
  • Emergency Contacts: Information for at least one emergency contact (name, relationship, phone) is crucial for safety and for involving family/support systems in urgent situations. If the patient has a health crisis, the care team knows who to call and the relationship (e.g. spouse, adult child) of that contact.
  • Care Plan Identifiers: Details such as the date the care plan was created, the date of last review or update, version number (if applicable), and the name/credentials of the plan’s author or coordinating clinician. These meta-data help track the plan’s evolution and ensure accountability. For instance, knowing that Dr. Smith, RN Care Manager, updated the plan on 10/15/2024 provides context and a point of contact for any questions about the current plan.
  • Insurance/Payer Information: While less about direct clinical care, documenting primary and secondary insurance details (insurer, policy number, etc.) is important for administrative coordination. It helps the care team anticipate coverage issues, obtain pre-authorizations for certain interventions, and ensure the patient has access to covered services without unnecessary delay.

Standardizing the collection and format of these foundational data elements across systems is the first critical step toward harmonization. Consistent data fields (with common codes/definitions) ensure accurate patient identification and allow information to flow seamlessly between systems, minimizing errors and delays. For example, adhering to a common address format or using standard codes for languages can help different electronic health records interpret the data correctly. In fact, CMS now requires that providers use structured electronic recording of core health information – including a comprehensive electronic care plan – as part of Chronic Care Management services . This means the care plan and demographics should be maintained in a certified EHR in a way that is shareable both within and outside the practice . By enforcing structured data capture at this foundational level, interoperability is greatly enhanced. In summary, “basics” like identification and contact info may seem straightforward, but getting them right (and consistent) system-wide is foundational to any unified care planning effort.

2.2 Comprehensive Assessment & Problem Identification

Building upon the foundational information, a comprehensive assessment forms the core of the care plan by providing a detailed understanding of the patient’s current health status and relevant history. This assessment is holistic – encompassing medical issues, mental health, functional abilities, and social factors. It typically includes:

  • Active Medical Diagnoses: A list of all the patient’s current and significant medical conditions (e.g. Type 2 Diabetes, Hypertension, COPD). Each should be clearly described, ideally with standardized codes (such as ICD-10) alongside plain-language names. Including details like onset date or whether a condition is chronic vs. acute gives important clinical context. (For instance, “Heart Failure (HFrEF) – diagnosed 2018, chronic, NYHA Class II” is more informative than just “Heart Failure.”)
  • Mental & Behavioral Health Status: Recognizing the integral link between mental and physical well-being, the plan should document any relevant mental health diagnoses or concerns (e.g. depression, anxiety, PTSD, history of trauma or substance use disorder). This ensures that psychological factors are considered in care – for example, managing diabetes may require addressing depression that affects medication adherence.
  • Problem List (Beyond Formal Diagnoses): This extends beyond formal diagnoses to include any issues impacting the patient’s health and well-being as identified by the patient, family, or care team. Examples might be “Risk of falls,” “Medication non-adherence,” “Social isolation,” or “Transportation barriers.” Such entries capture the patient’s lived experience and practical challenges, even if they’re not medical diagnoses. Including a problem like “Lives alone and forgets to take medications” flags an issue to address even if it doesn’t have an ICD-10 code. This broader problem list is particularly important for care navigators and aligns with a patient-centered approach.
  • Relevant History: A concise summary of pertinent past history – medical, surgical, family, and social – that influences current care. For example, a past stroke, a family history of early heart disease, or a history of smoking are important context. This helps the team understand baseline conditions and potential risks.
  • Allergies & Adverse Reactions: A comprehensive list of known allergies (to medications, foods, or other substances) and the nature of any past adverse reactions. This is a safety-critical component – clearly documenting something like “Allergy: Penicillin (anaphylaxis)” or “ACE inhibitors (history of angioedema)” can prevent life-threatening errors.
  • Medication Reconciliation: A current and accurate list of all medications the patient is taking – including prescriptions, over-the-counter drugs, supplements, and herbal remedies. Each entry should include the medication name, dose, route, frequency, and indication (i.e. why the patient is taking it), as well as the prescribing provider. This reconciled list is vital for preventing medication errors and interactions. It should be kept up-to-date as changes are made. (For instance, if a blood pressure medication is stopped, the list should reflect that immediately.) Many care plans include a section for medication management (see Section 4) that ties directly into this reconciled list.
  • Functional Status Assessment: An evaluation of the patient’s ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs) such as bathing, dressing, eating, and instrumental ADLs like managing finances, cooking, or transportation. Documenting functional status provides insight into the patient’s level of independence and need for support services. For example, noting that a patient “requires assistance with bathing and dressing due to arthritis” indicates that home care support might be needed.
  • Cognitive Status Assessment: An assessment of the patient’s cognitive abilities – memory, orientation, decision-making capacity, and ability to understand instructions. If a patient has cognitive impairment or dementia, the care plan must account for that (e.g. involving a caregiver in medication management, simplifying instructions, etc.). Conversely, documenting that a patient is fully oriented and capable helps in planning education and self-management expectations.
  • Nutritional Assessment: Key information on the patient’s nutritional status and needs. This might include current diet, any dietary restrictions (e.g. low-salt diet in heart failure), weight changes, appetite issues, or risks like malnutrition or obesity. If there are specific concerns (difficulty chewing, need for supplements, etc.), they should be noted. Nutrition plays a fundamental role in many health conditions, so integrating nutrition into the care plan is important.
  • Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) Assessment: A thorough evaluation of environmental and social factors that can significantly impact the patient’s health. This includes factors such as housing stability, food security, transportation access, financial strain, education level, employment status, social support network, neighborhood safety, and health literacy. For example, if a patient has trouble affording medications or lacks transportation to appointments, these are critical to note. Understanding these SDOH factors is essential for identifying potential barriers to care and mobilizing appropriate resources (community or governmental) to assist. Modern care frameworks increasingly emphasize SDOH; indeed, primary care guidelines advocate routine screening for social needs as part of comprehensive care .
  • Risk Assessment: Identification of specific risk factors that may require proactive intervention. This could be clinical risks (e.g. risk of falls, risk of pressure ulcers for bedbound patients, risk of hospital readmission for a patient with complex chronic conditions) or psychosocial risks (risk of suicide in a patient with severe depression, risk of abuse/neglect in a vulnerable individual). By highlighting key risks, the care team can implement preventive measures (for instance, a falls risk might trigger a home safety evaluation and physical therapy).

A truly comprehensive assessment goes beyond a checklist of diseases. It encompasses the patient’s mental, functional, cognitive, nutritional, and social well-being. This holistic view is fundamental to developing a care plan that addresses the individual’s unique needs and circumstances, rather than just treating diagnoses in isolation. For example, managing diabetes in a patient who also has mild dementia and low health literacy requires a very different approach than in a highly health-literate patient with no cognitive issues – and the care plan must reflect those differences.

Importantly, thorough assessment information must be captured in standardized ways to enable interoperability. Utilizing common coding systems (where possible) allows different health IT systems to understand and exchange the data. For instance, using ICD-10 codes for diagnoses, LOINC codes for lab results, SNOMED CT for clinical terms, and standardized assessment tools for functional status means that when the care plan data is shared electronically (e.g. via a health information exchange or a platform like Vinyl Health), the receiving system can accurately interpret the information . Standardized data is crucial for building a harmonized care plan that multiple providers and organizations can contribute to and access. This is aligned with U.S. interoperability initiatives – for example, elements like problems, medications, and goals are included in the U.S. Core Data for Interoperability (USCDI) standard that certified EHRs must be able to share.

In summary, the comprehensive assessment and problem identification section of the care plan ensures that nothing important about the patient is overlooked. It creates a 360-degree view of the patient’s health status and context. This allows the care team to form a plan that is truly responsive to the patient’s conditions and situation – the necessary foundation before setting goals or interventions.

3. Patient-Centered Goal Setting: The Heart of the Care Plan

If the assessment tells us where the patient is, the Goals of Care section outlines where the patient (and care team) want to go. This section represents the core of a patient-centered care plan, shifting the focus from simply treating medical conditions to also encompassing the patient’s own aspirations and priorities for their health and life. Modern care planning recognizes that healthcare should be about more than just disease management – it should help individuals achieve personal health and life goals that matter to them .

Effectively eliciting and documenting a patient’s overarching goals, priorities, and values is paramount. It requires active listening, empathy, and a genuine effort to understand what matters most to the individual. The care provider might ask open-ended questions like, “What are you hoping to be able to do in 6 months that you can’t do now?” or “What are your biggest concerns or wishes regarding your health?”. The documentation should reflect the patient’s perspective and, whenever possible, use their own words to capture their unique voice. For example, a patient might say, “I want to be able to play with my grandchildren again.” Such a statement should be noted in the care plan, not as a medical goal per se but as a guiding personal goal that will shape the care approach.

Once the patient’s broader aspirations are understood, they are typically translated into more concrete objectives using the SMART framework – goals that are Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound. SMART goals provide a clear roadmap for both the patient and the care team, making it evident what everyone is working toward and how success will be recognized . These goals are often categorized by domain, for example:

  • Clinical Goals: Focused on specific health outcomes. Example: “Achieve an HbA1c (blood sugar) level of <7.5% within 6 months” for a patient with diabetes. Or “Maintain blood pressure <130/80 through next quarter.” These align with medical targets.
  • Functional Goals: Related to the patient’s ability to perform activities of daily life. Example: “Increase walking distance to 1 mile without rest by March” for a patient in cardiac rehab, or “Patient will independently bathe and dress herself within 3 months” in a post-stroke rehabilitation plan.
  • Behavioral/Lifestyle Goals: Addressing habits or behaviors. Example: “Quit smoking within 3 months,” or “Attend a weekly exercise class at the community center for the next 8 weeks.” These often tie into prevention and long-term health maintenance.
  • Knowledge or Self-Management Goals: Focused on the patient’s understanding of their condition and ability to manage it. Example: “Demonstrate correct use of the asthma inhaler by next clinic visit” or “List all medications and their purposes accurately in two weeks.” This ensures the patient gains the knowledge needed for adherence.
  • Social/SDOH-related Goals: Aimed at mitigating social barriers. Example: “Secure reliable transportation to dialysis sessions within one month” or “Apply for food assistance benefits this quarter to improve nutrition.” These link to the social determinant issues identified.
  • Caregiver Goals: If a caregiver is heavily involved, the plan might also include goals for the caregiver’s well-being or education. Example: “Spouse will attend caregiver support group at least once this month” or “Daughter will learn proper wound dressing technique by next nurse visit.” Supporting caregivers can indirectly improve patient outcomes.

By making goals SMART, the care plan establishes clear targets: Specific (clearly defined), Measurable (so progress can be tracked), Achievable (realistic for the patient’s situation), Relevant (truly important to the patient’s life or health), and Time-bound (with a timeline or deadline). For instance, “improve mobility” is vague, whereas “walk 10 minutes continuously, at least 5 days a week, within 4 weeks” is a SMART goal that can be measured and worked on systematically.

The process of setting patient-centered goals is intrinsically linked to the concept of patient ownership and motivation. When care plans are built around what the patient wants to achieve, patients are more likely to feel a sense of ownership and be motivated to work towards those goals . This is supported by evidence – studies have shown that collaborative goal-setting (especially using techniques like motivational interviewing and SMART goals) can lead to improved health behaviors and outcomes . For example, a patient who sets a goal to dance at their child’s wedding will have a personal drive to adhere to a cardiac rehab plan, beyond just “because the doctor said so.” The care team’s role is to harness that personal motivation and align clinical interventions accordingly.

In Vinyl Health’s platform (and similar patient-centered tools), there are features to facilitate this crucial step. The application can guide clinicians through a structured goal-setting process, possibly with templated prompts or examples. For instance, the software might prompt, “Ask the patient about their personal goals: ________” and provide space to record it. By ensuring that goals of care are captured and prominently displayed, the platform keeps the “why” of the care plan front and center.

To summarize, the Goals of Care section shifts the narrative from “What’s the matter with the patient?” to “What matters to the patient?”. It ensures the care plan is driven not only by clinical indicators but by the individual’s life context and aspirations. This alignment is what makes a care plan truly patient-centered. A plan without patient-driven goals is merely a to-do list for providers; a plan with such goals becomes a shared commitment between patient and providers to achieve outcomes that are meaningful to the patient.

4. Interventions and Actions: Translating Goals into Practice

With clear goals established, the care plan must specify how to reach those goals. The Interventions & Action Plan section lays out the specific strategies, treatments, and steps that will be implemented. It is essentially the answer to: “What is everyone going to do to make sure the goals are met?”. This section should be comprehensive, typically covering areas such as:

  • Medical & Therapeutic Interventions: These are the clinical actions planned. For example, if a goal is to improve diabetes control, an intervention might be “Start metformin 500mg BID” or “Refer to endocrinologist for insulin pump evaluation.” Other examples include scheduling a surgery or procedure, initiating physical therapy, or arranging a specialist consult. Each intervention should be tied to one or more goals or problems identified. It’s helpful to indicate who is responsible (e.g. primary care to refer to specialist, cardiologist to evaluate chest pain, etc.).
  • Medication Management Plan: Beyond simply listing medications (which is part of the assessment), this describes any changes or management strategies: for instance, plans to initiate, adjust, or discontinue medications. It might include notes like “Titrate lisinopril dose every 2 weeks as tolerated to reach BP goal,” or “Plan to taper off prednisone over next 1 month.” It should also include strategies for supporting medication adherence, such as “Pharmacy blister packs will be provided” or “Home health nurse to do weekly med setup,” especially if non-adherence was identified as a problem.
  • Monitoring Plan: This specifies what clinical parameters will be tracked, how often, and by whom. For example, “Monitor blood glucose daily at home; patient to log results and review with nurse weekly” or “Clinic blood pressure checks every two weeks for 2 months.” It also should clarify what to do with the data – e.g. “if BP >140/90 on two consecutive checks, notify provider.” Monitoring could include vital signs, symptom diaries, lab tests at intervals (like a follow-up A1c in 3 months), or use of remote patient monitoring devices. Clearly defining who is responsible for monitoring (patient, nurse, physician, caregiver, or even a telehealth system) and when/where to report abnormal findings is critical to avoid gaps.
  • Education Plan: Patient and caregiver education is often a big part of interventions. This would outline what educational topics are needed and how education will be delivered. For example, “Educate patient and spouse on heart failure symptom management and when to call clinic – to be done by RN during next visit” or “Provide printed and video education on inhaler technique and have patient demonstrate understanding by next appointment.” Considering the patient’s preferred learning style or literacy level is important here (some patients prefer written info, others need a live demo or teach-back). The plan might note tools or resources (e.g. disease-specific booklets, classes, or digital education modules).
  • Psychosocial & Behavioral Interventions: If the assessment uncovered mental health needs or psychosocial issues, the care plan should include actions to address them. For instance, “Refer to counseling for anxiety management,” or “Enroll patient in substance use treatment program,” or “Schedule family meeting with social worker to discuss caregiver stress.” Support groups, therapy, or psychiatric consultations would fall under here. Behavioral interventions like a smoking cessation program or nutritional counseling by a dietitian are also included.
  • SDOH Interventions & Resource Linkage: For any social determinant challenges identified, this part of the plan explicitly addresses them. E.g., “Social worker to assist patient in applying for Medicaid transportation services for dialysis appointments,” or “Refer to community food pantry for supplemental groceries – care coordinator to follow up within 2 weeks.” Vinyl Health, for instance, has features to link patients with community resources; the care plan should note which resources are being leveraged. By documenting these, accountability is created (someone on the team will follow up to ensure the connection was made).
  • Preventive Care: Even while focusing on acute issues, a good care plan doesn’t ignore routine health maintenance. There should be a note of the patient’s preventive care status – e.g., “Due for colonoscopy – schedule within 3 months,” or “Up to date on immunizations except needs high-dose flu shot, will administer next visit.” Including preventive care ensures the patient’s overall health is managed, not just their chief complaints.
  • Contingency and Emergency Plan: This is essentially the “What if things don’t go as expected?” section. It provides clear instructions on what to do if certain scenarios occur – for example, “If weight increases >3 lbs in 2 days (heart failure symptom), patient to double diuretic dose and call clinic” or “If patient experiences chest pain unrelieved by nitroglycerin, call 911.” It may also outline a backup plan if goals are not met: “If depression scores do not improve after 3 months on therapy, consider psychiatric referral.” Having contingency plans spelled out improves patient safety and confidence. The patient and family should know what constitutes an emergency and have a plan (e.g. who to contact 24/7 – some plans list an on-call number or instruct to go to nearest ER in certain cases).

In crafting the intervention plan, it is essential that the chosen actions are grounded in the best available evidence or clinical guidelines. This is where clinical decision support and professional expertise come in. For example, if a patient has had a heart attack, the care plan should include evidence-based interventions like starting a beta-blocker and statin (unless contraindicated) because guidelines recommend it. A platform like Vinyl Health can assist by providing templates or suggestions of interventions based on diagnoses (akin to order sets), or integrating clinical guidelines into the care planning workflow. It could nudge the provider: “Patients with diabetes and hypertension should have a yearly eye exam – consider adding referral to ophthalmology”, thereby promoting evidence-based comprehensive care.

Collaboration in selecting interventions is also key. The care plan is often crafted by an interdisciplinary team (see Section 5), not just a single physician. A complex plan might involve input from doctors, nurses, pharmacists, dietitians, social workers, etc. – each contributing interventions in their domain. The plan should clearly denote who is responsible for each intervention (e.g. “Physical Therapy: Evaluate and treat for gait training – PT referral (Dr. Jones to initiate)” or “Dietitian: Medical nutrition therapy x 3 sessions (order placed by primary care)”). Vinyl Health facilitates this by allowing multiple team members to update the shared care plan and assign tasks accordingly, with tracking so nothing is missed.

Crucially, the interventions and action steps must be described in clear, concise, and understandable language for both the patient and the care team . For patients, jargon-free explanations of what is going to happen improve adherence. For example, instead of writing “OTC analgesics PRN for coxalgia,” the plan might say “Take Tylenol 500mg as needed up to 3x/day for hip pain.” Similarly, care team communication should be unambiguous – if the plan says “check labs,” it should specify which labs and who will check them. Everyone involved (patient, family, providers) should know their roles and the specific actions they need to take to achieve the agreed-upon goals . This clarity fosters accountability and engagement: the patient knows what they need to do (and why), and each provider knows what their tasks are.

To illustrate, consider a patient with heart failure whose goals include walking 15 minutes without shortness of breath and avoiding hospitalizations. The interventions section might include: medication adjustments (by the cardiologist), a low-salt diet and weight monitoring plan (with education by a nurse or dietitian), an exercise regimen (with physical therapy input), home visits by a nursing service for monitoring, addressing SDOH (arranging transportation to appointments via a community service), and a contingency plan (increase diuretic and call clinic if weight gain). Each item is assigned and time-framed. This way, the lofty goals translate into tangible steps.

In summary, the Interventions and Actions section is where the rubber meets the road. It operationalizes the care plan – turning assessments and goals into a coordinated set of activities. A well-detailed action plan is the difference between a care plan that’s merely a document and one that actually drives daily care. Vinyl Health’s application supports this by providing a structured, shareable checklist of interventions that all team members can see and update in real time, ensuring nothing falls through the cracks and care is delivered as planned.

5. Fostering Collaboration: The Interdisciplinary Care Team

Effective care, especially for individuals with complex or chronic conditions, requires a coordinated effort from a diverse team of healthcare professionals. The Care Team Coordination section of the care plan explicitly identifies all the players involved and defines their roles and responsibilities. Making the care team structure clear helps avoid confusion and ensures that every aspect of the care plan is addressed through teamwork.

First and foremost, the care plan should list the interdisciplinary care team members: for example, Primary Care Physician – Dr. A (team lead), Cardiologist – Dr. B, Nurse Care Manager – Jane C, Social Worker – John D, Pharmacist – Dr. E, Family Caregiver – [Name], etc., including the organizations or affiliations and contact information for each as relevant. By laying this out, anyone reviewing the plan (including the patient and family) can immediately see who is involved in the patient’s care. A platform like Vinyl Health might display a “care team roster” at the top of the care plan. This is crucial in today’s fragmented system where a patient might see multiple providers; a harmonized care plan essentially unites those providers on one page.

Clear role definition is important. For instance, if a nurse navigator is coordinating follow-ups, it should be noted. If a community health worker is helping with home assessments, include them. The American Geriatrics Society has emphasized the need for one primary or lead point of contact on the team – often this is a care coordinator or primary physician – who takes charge of ensuring the plan is executed and serves as the go-to person for the patient/caregiver. The care plan should identify this lead contact (e.g. “Care Coordinator: Jane C, RN – primary contact for any questions (phone XXX-XXX-XXXX) ”). This prevents the common problem of patients not knowing whom to call for what, and it provides clarity within the team about who is orchestrating the overall plan.

Open, timely communication is the lifeblood of a successful care team. The care plan can facilitate this by specifying communication channels and frequency. For example, it might note that the team will have a brief weekly huddle (by phone or via a secure messaging thread) to update on the patient’s status, or that certain information (like an ER visit) should be communicated immediately to all team members. Vinyl Health’s platform supports secure messaging and notifications – for instance, if the care plan is updated or if there’s a significant event (hospital admission, etc.), all relevant team members can be notified in real time. Epic’s Care Everywhere interoperability network is an example of how sharing patient records across different systems can ensure all providers have the latest information; it has enabled health systems to “share common patient information seamlessly and in real time to improve care” across facilities . Similarly, Vinyl Health aims to ensure that when one provider updates the plan (say, changes a medication or adds a new problem), everyone – including the patient – sees those changes.

In coordinating an interdisciplinary team, it is also important to proactively discuss and document who is doing which task. The care plan might include a section like “Team Assignments” mapping interventions to team members (some systems allow tagging a task with a provider’s name). For example: “Dietitian: will counsel patient on low-sodium diet by Jan 30,” “Home care nurse: will conduct weekly wound dressing changes,” etc. The Federal Register’s recent RFI on person-centered care planning underscores the necessity of such proactive role identification and task assignment among care team members . By making these explicit, the plan reduces duplication (two people accidentally doing the same thing) and gaps (everyone assuming someone else was handling it). It also sets the stage for accountability – tasks can later be checked off or flagged if pending.

Another facet of collaboration is ensuring everyone has access to the same information. Interoperability is key here: all team members, potentially across different organizations, should be able to view and contribute to the care plan. Technologies like health information exchanges or interoperable platforms (using standards like HL7 FHIR CarePlan resources) are enabling this. In the U.S., efforts like the Trusted Exchange Framework (TEFCA) aim to allow seamless data sharing nationwide, which will include care plan data. Already, Epic’s Care Everywhere allows exchange of care plans and records with non-Epic systems via nationwide networks , illustrating progress towards industry-wide collaboration.

Equally important is involving the patient and family caregivers as part of the team. They should not be seen as outsiders but rather as core members of the care team (as PCMH principles highlight ). Thus, the care plan should also document the patient’s role in self-management and any family caregiver roles (e.g. “Wife will administer insulin injections each morning”). Ensuring the patient and caregiver have the tools and knowledge to fulfill their roles (which ties back to the education plan in Section 4 and the preference/ownership section in Section 6) is part of team-based care.

In practice, coordinating a care team might involve regular case conferences or virtual team meetings for complex patients. Vinyl Health can support scheduling of these or a virtual space for discussion. The plan might note, for example, “Monthly care team teleconference to review progress – next due on Feb 15.”

To illustrate, imagine a frail elderly patient with diabetes, heart failure, and mild cognitive impairment: Her team might include a primary doctor, cardiologist, endocrinologist, nurse case manager, pharmacist (reviewing meds for interactions), a social worker (helping with support services), and her daughter as caregiver. The care plan lists all these members with contacts. It notes the primary doctor as lead contact. It documents that the nurse case manager will call the patient weekly, and that the pharmacist will do a medication review after any hospital discharge. When the patient had a recent emergency room visit for shortness of breath, that information was quickly shared to everyone through the shared care plan platform, so the cardiologist and primary doctor could adjust the plan (medications, follow-up appointment) without waiting. This kind of tight coordination can significantly improve outcomes and patient experience.

In summary, the Care Team section of a harmonized care plan operationalizes the “team-based” approach by explicitly naming the team, defining roles (including a clear team leader), and establishing communication practices. By doing so, it breaks the silos between different providers. Vinyl Health facilitates clear identification of each team member and supports communication through features like secure messaging, shared access, and update notifications . The result is that all team members – across disciplines and even organizational boundaries – stay on the same page. This not only improves efficiency (everyone knows who’s doing what) but also ensures the patient receives cohesive, not contradictory, guidance. It transforms a group of professionals into a true team working in concert toward the patient’s goals.

6. Empowering the Patient: Ownership and Preferences

A truly patient-centered care plan places the individual patient (and their caregivers) at the heart of the planning process, respecting their preferences, values, and autonomy. The Patient & Caregiver Specifics section of the care plan focuses on tailoring care to the person’s unique life context and ensuring they have ownership of the plan.

One critical component is the formal integration of patient preferences into the care plan. This can include preferences about treatments (e.g. preferring to try lifestyle changes before medications, or vice versa), how they wish to communicate with the team, cultural or religious considerations that might affect care, dietary preferences, and more. For example, a patient might strongly prefer no blood products due to religious beliefs, or might state they prefer phone calls over emails for urgent updates. All such preferences should be documented prominently. By doing so, the care plan acts as a guide for any provider interacting with the patient – reminding them “this patient values X and wants Y”. Vinyl Health provides a dedicated space to document these preferences and ensures they are prominently displayed (e.g. a banner that might say “Prefers minimal medication, tries non-pharmacological interventions first” or “Primary language: Spanish; use interpreter for all discussions” etc.) . This way, any clinician opening the care plan is immediately aware of these personal factors and can honor them.

Another aspect is ensuring the care plan is accessible and understandable to the patient. A plan that sits only in a clinic’s records is of little use to the patient. Today, U.S. federal rules (the 21st Century Cures Act) mandate that patients have electronic access to their health information, including care plan elements . That means patients should be able to view their care plan via portals or receive an electronic/paper copy readily. Vinyl Health’s design is very much aligned with this: the platform is user-friendly and offers multiple access points (web, mobile app) so that patients and family members can review the care plan anytime. Just as important as access is comprehensibility. The care plan should be written in plain language, or at least have patient-facing summaries for each section. Medical jargon or abbreviations should be minimized or explained. For example, instead of writing “CKD stage 3, manage BP <130/80 to slow progression,” a patient-facing note might say “You have moderate kidney disease. We will keep your blood pressure below 130/80 to help protect your kidneys.” Empowerment comes from understanding – when patients understand the plan, they are more likely to follow it and contribute to it.

Empowerment also involves giving the patient and caregivers an active role in the plan. This could mean the plan explicitly lists tasks the patient will do (e.g. daily exercise, glucose monitoring) and tasks the caregiver will handle (e.g. manage medications weekly). By listing these, it acknowledges the patient as a co-provider of their care. It is also a commitment by the healthcare team to support the patient in those tasks (through education, tools, or check-ins). Some care plans even have the patient or caregiver sign off or agree to the plan, which is a way of saying “this plan is not just something done to you, but something with you.” In Vinyl Health, after a care plan review, the patient’s agreement/consent can be documented digitally . This ensures transparency and that the patient is on board with what’s planned.

Advance Care Planning is another crucial element often included here. This refers to documentation of the patient’s wishes regarding future care, especially in serious illness or end-of-life situations. The care plan should note whether the patient has an Advance Directive, Living Will, or Healthcare Power of Attorney, and where those documents are located. If, for example, a patient has a living will that says they do not want feeding tubes, that should be flagged in the care plan. Also, the patient’s code status (whether they want resuscitation in case of cardiac/respiratory arrest, i.e. Full Code vs DNR/DNI) is critical information that must be clearly visible to all providers . Vinyl Health’s platform would ensure these are displayed prominently (given their life-and-death importance). By having this in the care plan, any provider or facility (ER, hospital, etc.) that accesses the plan through an interoperable system would immediately know the patient’s wishes, which is a huge step for respecting patient autonomy and avoiding unwanted interventions.

Additionally, this section should identify any primary caregivers and assess their needs. Caregivers (family or otherwise) play a pivotal role, yet they often need support too. The plan might note, for example, “Caregiver: spouse John Doe – is experiencing burnout; plan includes respite care referral” or “Caregiver is trained to do wound care – continue to monitor caregiver’s ability to perform tasks.” Recognizing caregivers in the plan validates their role and allows the healthcare team to extend support or training to them as needed . Vinyl Health might include a caregiver profile – contact info and any specific notes (like “has hearing impairment, use email instead of phone to contact caregiver”).

In summary, the Patient & Caregiver Specifics section ensures the care plan is deeply personalized. It answers questions like: What does the patient want or not want? Who is helping them day-to-day? What are this patient’s values and circumstances that we must respect? By embedding these into the plan, the care is tailored and the patient gains a sense of control. This approach is supported by the ethos of person-centered care: “care in which individuals’ values and preferences guide all aspects of their health care” . Indeed, essential elements of person-centered care identified by experts include an individualized care plan based on the person’s preferences, and active involvement of an interprofessional team with the person at the center, including “one lead point of contact”, “active coordination”, and “feedback from the person and caregivers” to improve care .

By providing easy access, understandable language, and incorporation of patient preferences, Vinyl Health is designed to empower patients. The patient is encouraged to view their care plan as “my plan” rather than a set of doctor’s orders. As a result, they are more likely to engage in their care actively, which correlates with better outcomes. Moreover, when patients feel heard and respected (their preferences honored, their autonomy upheld), it fosters trust and a stronger therapeutic relationship with providers.

Lastly, it’s worth noting that empowering patients also means addressing any barriers they have to following the plan. This could overlap with SDOH – for instance, a patient can’t “own” their plan if they can’t read it due to low literacy or can’t access it due to no internet. The care team should mitigate these – perhaps by providing a simplified printed summary or involving a community health worker to review the plan in person. True patient ownership happens when the healthcare system meets patients where they are. The care plan should evolve as a living document co-created with the patient, rather than a static directive handed to them.

7. Engaging Payers and Community Partners in Care Planning

While much of the care plan focuses on the interplay between healthcare providers, patients, and immediate caregivers, two other stakeholder groups are increasingly important for a truly harmonized approach: payers (health insurers, including government payers like Medicare/Medicaid) and community-based organizations. Engaging these partners can greatly enhance care coordination, resource availability, and sustainability of the care plan.

Payers (Health Plans/Insurers): In the U.S., payers are not just passive bill-payers; many have active programs to improve care coordination and patient outcomes. For patients with complex needs, health plans often provide case management or care coordination services of their own. This means a case manager or care coordinator employed by the insurer might reach out to the patient to help manage their care plan, arrange services, or navigate benefits. The care plan should acknowledge if such a person exists and involve them. For example, if a Medicare Advantage plan’s case manager is helping a patient with COPD, they should ideally have access to and input in the unified care plan. Coordination with payers can ensure that the interventions in the plan are aligned with what’s covered by insurance or eligible for certain programs. It can also streamline approvals for services (since the payer is literally at the table and aware of the medical necessity as documented in the plan).

Engaging payers also means the care plan reflects quality and cost-effective care strategies. Payers are interested in outcomes like reduced hospital readmissions, medication adherence, and preventive care completion – all of which can be facilitated by a solid care plan. CMS, for instance, has programs like the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program that encourage improved coordination to avoid readmissions . When a care plan is executed properly (with follow-ups, patient support, etc.), it aligns with these payer goals. Some care plan elements might be directly influenced by payer guidelines: for example, Medicare’s Chronic Care Management (CCM) services require that a comprehensive care plan be in place with certain elements (problem list, expected outcomes, measurable goals, periodic review, etc.) . By meeting these requirements, providers can bill for care management and the patient gets more structured support. The CCM care plan has to be shared with the patient and, as needed, with other providers – a process Vinyl Health can automate (e.g., generating a patient-friendly care plan summary every month as required).

Payers also often have data that can inform the care plan – such as medication fill histories, notifications when a patient is admitted to a hospital (via claims or networks), or gaps in care reports (like overdue screenings). A harmonized platform might integrate some of this data (with appropriate permissions) so that, for example, the care plan alerts the team if the patient hasn’t refilled a critical medication (information coming from insurance pharmacy data). Bamboo Health is an example of a company that works across providers and payers to deliver real-time care coordination intelligence; it partners with health plans and state agencies to provide notifications and insights across a broad network . In 2021, Bamboo Health (which resulted from the merger of PatientPing and Appriss Health) impacted over 1 billion patient encounters by connecting 2,500 hospitals, 7,900+ post-acute facilities, 32 health plans, and many other entities in a care collaboration network . This shows the scale at which payers and providers can collaborate through technology. The care plan benefits from such collaboration by receiving timely info (like an ER visit alert) and by extending its reach – for instance, a health plan case manager might update the plan with a note that they arranged a home visit, or the plan might note that the insurer’s disease management program is calling the patient weekly about their diabetes.

Furthermore, involving payers helps align the care plan with financial realities. If a certain intervention is not covered, the team can work with the payer to find alternatives or secure authorizations. Payers may also offer benefits that the care team should leverage – e.g., many Medicare Advantage plans offer transportation assistance, meal delivery after hospitalizations, or gym memberships. If the care plan notes a need (transport, nutrition, exercise), the payer representative can say, “By the way, the patient’s insurance can cover X service.” This integration of benefits prevents missed opportunities. The care plan becomes a tool not just for clinical management but also for coordinating benefits and services across the spectrum of care.

Community Organizations: Health does not only happen in clinics and hospitals – it largely happens in the community. Engaging community resources can be the difference between a plan that succeeds and one that fails, especially when social determinants are involved. If a care plan identifies needs like food insecurity, transportation, social isolation, or the need for supported housing, purely medical interventions won’t resolve those. Linking to community-based organizations (CBOs) is essential. These could be meal programs (like Meals on Wheels), transportation services, support groups, non-profits offering financial assistance, senior centers, housing agencies, etc.

The care plan should list which community resources are being activated. For example: “Referred to Area Agency on Aging for home safety assessment (contact: Jane Smith, AAA, phone…)” or “Community health worker from XYZ Community Center to visit patient weekly for blood pressure checks.” When these are listed, it acknowledges the broader team beyond healthcare providers. It also provides contact points so that healthcare providers can communicate with community providers as needed (with patient consent). Many regions are developing community resource referral platforms (like Aunt Bertha/Findhelp, UniteUs, or others) which connect healthcare with social care. Vinyl Health incorporates a directory and integration with external databases of community services , making it easier for providers to find and refer to appropriate support. Once a referral is made, ideally the platform can track it – showing whether the patient connected with the service.

In a harmonized care plan, community partners might even have access to update certain parts. For instance, a nutritionist from a community diabetes program could log the patient’s attendance at classes or progress in diet changes, which becomes part of the shared plan. This level of integration is still emerging, but it’s the direction things are headed with cross-sector collaborations and health information exchanges including social data.

Engaging community organizations also addresses equity. It ensures that vulnerable aspects of a patient’s life are not ignored. The WHO’s framework for integrated people-centered services calls for “coordinating services within and across sectors” and creating an “enabling environment” for health – meaning health systems must partner with sectors like social services, housing, and education. For example, an asthmatic patient’s care plan might involve the local housing authority if mold in their home is a trigger, or a patient with limited education might benefit from adult literacy programs to better manage medications. Including these in the plan elevates them to the same importance as, say, prescribing an inhaler.

Information sharing with payers and community partners must of course respect privacy (HIPAA, etc.). Usually, patient consent is obtained to share their care plan with these extended stakeholders. Once consent is in place, Vinyl Health or similar platforms can allow controlled access. The Federal RFI on care planning envisions shared electronic care plans (“e-care plans”) that facilitate coordination among not just clinicians but also patients and potentially community supports . It also calls out the need to involve diverse stakeholders, including payers, in the development and implementation of care plans . The recognition is that care planning is a multi-party effort, and innovative approaches are needed to incorporate all voices.

In practical terms, how might payers and community integration look in a patient’s plan? Consider a patient with heart failure and limited mobility who is frequently in the hospital. The plan could involve the patient’s Medicaid health plan case manager, who arranges for in-home personal care services (through a waiver program) and ensures the patient gets a remote monitoring device that the insurer provides. It could also involve a community paramedicine program (through the local EMS) that does home check-ups – that program, being community-based, shares its visit notes into the care plan. The local Meals on Wheels might deliver low-salt meals and report if the patient isn’t answering the door (sign of trouble). All these notes funnel into one unified plan record that the cardiologist and primary doctor see, giving them a full picture. This reduces duplicative outreach (everyone knows Meals on Wheels is in place, etc.) and catches issues early.

In summary, engaging payers and community organizations extends the care plan beyond the walls of the clinic. It aligns financial resources (from insurers) and social resources (from community agencies) with the patient’s health goals. By actively involving these stakeholders, care becomes more holistic and sustainable. Payers help ensure interventions are covered and possibly contribute care coordination personnel and data; community partners help address root causes and provide ongoing support in the patient’s environment. A state-of-the-art care plan platform like Vinyl Health is built to include these interactions, effectively creating an ecosystem of care around the patient. This multi-stakeholder approach is what truly “wraps around” the patient to meet medical, behavioral, and social needs in concert.

8. Continuous Improvement: Evaluation, Review, and Updates

A care plan is not a static document – it is a dynamic tool that must evolve with the patient’s changing condition, progress, and circumstances. The process of continuous evaluation and updating ensures that the care plan remains relevant and effective over time. This section of the care plan outlines how and when the plan will be revisited, and how everyone will know whether the plan is working.

Key elements of this continuous improvement process include:

  • Evaluation Plan: This specifies how progress toward each goal will be measured and when. For each goal or major intervention, there should be a clear outcome metric or milestone. For example, if the goal is improved HbA1c, the evaluation might be “Repeat HbA1c lab in 3 months to assess progress.” If a goal is functional (walk 15 minutes), the evaluation might be “Physical therapy re-assessment in 4 weeks to measure walking duration.” Additionally, who is responsible for evaluation is noted (doctor will review labs, physical therapist will report functional gains, etc.). Essentially, this sets the plan for measuring success. It’s not enough to implement interventions – we need to circle back and see if they worked.
  • Scheduled Reviews: The care plan should have planned touchpoints for comprehensive review. For instance, “Care plan review with patient and full care team every 6 months” or “…every quarter.” In some programs, this is required (Medicare CCM requires at least annual review, many recommend quarterly). At these reviews, the team (and patient) can discuss which goals have been met, which need more time, and whether new goals or problems have emerged. Regular reviews ensure the plan stays up-to-date. Vinyl Health facilitates scheduling these reviews and may prompt users when a periodic review is due.
  • Triggers for Unscheduled Review: Aside from scheduled intervals, the care plan should list conditions that would prompt an earlier review or revision. Common triggers include a significant change in health status (e.g. a new diagnosis or a major event like a hospitalization), lack of progress (e.g. goals consistently not met), or patient circumstances changes (like loss of a caregiver or change in living situation). For example, “Trigger: any hospitalization → initiate care plan review within 1 week of discharge.” By defining these, the team is prepared to adapt quickly when something changes. This flexibility is crucial; a plan should never become outdated just because one waits for the next scheduled checkpoint.
  • Documentation of Updates: When changes are made, it’s important to log what changed, when, and by whom. Version control is akin to how one would track changes in a project plan. In the care plan, you might see entries like “Jan 5, 2025: Blood pressure goal achieved, metoprolol dose reduced per Dr. X.” This history is useful for tracking the patient’s journey and understanding the rationale for past changes. Vinyl Health likely keeps an audit trail of edits and can show a summary of changes between versions.
  • Patient/Caregiver Agreement and Feedback: Each time the plan is updated, it’s good practice to confirm that the patient (and caregiver, if appropriate) understands the changes and consents to the new plan. In a sense, the care plan should always be a negotiated agreement. Documenting “Patient agrees with the above plan and commits to follow the outlined actions; caregiver present and also concurs” is both a medico-legal and a motivational step. It reinforces that this is a partnership. Some care plans even obtain patient signatures (physically or electronically). In Vinyl Health, after a care plan review meeting, the platform could capture an electronic acknowledgment from the patient that they’ve reviewed and understand the plan . This not only empowers the patient but also ensures transparency.
  • Quality Metrics and Performance Feedback: On a broader scale, continuous improvement can also refer to using data from the patient (and populations of similar patients) to refine care. For instance, tracking the patient’s readmissions or ER visits over time can indicate if the care plan is preventing crises. Additionally, incorporating patient-reported feedback – e.g., the patient might fill out a satisfaction or confidence survey about their care plan – can identify areas to improve from the user perspective. The AGS expert panel highlights “performance measurement and quality improvement using feedback from the person and caregivers” as an essential element of person-centered care . That means periodically asking the patient, “Is this care plan addressing your needs? Do you feel supported?” and using that feedback to adjust processes.

Continuous improvement also has a higher-level meaning: it’s part of a learning health system. Each patient’s care plan outcomes provide insight into what works or doesn’t. Over time, patterns can be observed (e.g. patients with a certain combination of issues do better if X is in the plan). This can inform future care planning. For the individual patient, though, the focus is on adapting to real life. Life is not static; new challenges or achievements will come, and the care plan must be a living document that grows accordingly.

In practice, consider a patient with multiple chronic conditions: Initially, the care plan might focus on blood pressure, blood sugar, and depression management with monthly check-ins. After 3 months, suppose blood pressure is at goal, but depression is worse. The scheduled review at 3 months would note success in BP (and thus perhaps remove daily nurse calls for BP monitoring) but need to intensify depression interventions (maybe add a counselor or adjust medications). The plan is updated – perhaps adding a new goal for mental health or a new intervention like psychotherapy. The patient is consulted, agrees, and the care plan document is revised. Two weeks later, the patient has an unexpected hospitalization for heart failure. That triggers an unscheduled review: the team reconvenes (maybe virtually) post-discharge, updates the problem list (adding “recent HF exacerbation”), adjusts interventions (tweaking medications, adding a home health nurse visit, etc.), and sets a sooner follow-up. The plan now reflects these changes, and all team members are alerted. Throughout, each change is dated and attributed.

This ongoing cycle prevents the plan from collecting dust. It ensures relevance. Moreover, it provides a mechanism for accountability: if a goal was not achieved, the review process asks why – Was the intervention not effective? Was the patient unable to follow it? Do we need a different approach? It’s a built-in continuous quality improvement loop for that individual’s care.

Vinyl Health supports this iterative nature by making the update process straightforward and collaborative. Care plans on the platform can be updated in real time and instantly redistributed to the team and patient, which is far superior to the old model of static paper care plans that might not get revisited until the next clinic appointment. Notifications for when a review is due, or when a certain result triggers an alert, are part of the system’s functionality .

In conclusion, the continuous improvement aspect of care planning recognizes that caring for a person is a journey, not a one-time event. The care plan is like a compass that must be recalibrated as the terrain changes. By explicitly planning for evaluation and updates, the care team commits to staying responsive and accountable. This leads to better outcomes, as interventions are modified before failures compound. It also enhances patient trust – they see that the team is paying attention and adjusting to their needs, rather than forgetting about the plan once it’s written. Ultimately, this dynamic process is what makes a care plan a powerful tool for long-term health management rather than a static checklist.

9. The Role of Social Determinants of Health in Holistic Care Planning

We have touched on social determinants of health (SDOH) throughout earlier sections, but their significance warrants a dedicated discussion. Recognizing and addressing SDOH is fundamental to providing equitable and effective healthcare. These determinants – economic stability, education, health literacy, housing, transportation, social support, etc. – can heavily influence a patient’s health outcomes and their ability to adhere to a care plan. A care plan that ignores SDOH may fall short because unseen social barriers undermine even the best medical advice.

Vinyl Health’s approach is to incorporate a robust SDOH assessment and linkage mechanism directly into the care planning process. As noted in Section 2.2, the assessment should catalog key SDOH factors for each patient (e.g., income challenges, food insecurity, lack of family support, unsafe housing, limited English proficiency, and so on). But documentation is only the first step. The care plan must integrate interventions targeting those identified social needs.

For example, if housing instability is noted, the care plan might include a goal of obtaining stable housing and an intervention such as referring to a housing assistance program. If low health literacy is identified, interventions include extra education and teach-back methods to ensure understanding. If transportation is a barrier, the plan would incorporate arranging rides for appointments (through insurance, community volunteers, or ride-share programs). By explicitly writing these into the plan, they gain visibility and are more likely to be addressed.

The inclusion of SDOH in care planning aligns with broader healthcare trends. The American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) and other bodies have advocated screening for social needs in primary care and linking patients to resources as part of routine care . The reason is clear: unmet social needs often lead to poor medication adherence, missed appointments, and worse health outcomes. Addressing them can improve those outcomes and even reduce healthcare costs (for instance, providing a food insecure diabetic patient with nutrition support can prevent costly hospitalizations for hyperglycemia).

A critical component of addressing SDOH is linking patients with relevant community resources. Vinyl Health includes a directory of community-based services and can integrate with external databases (like 2-1-1 or Unite Us networks) to facilitate referrals . Suppose during care planning, the nurse identifies that a patient cannot afford their medications. The platform might allow the nurse to search a directory for local prescription assistance programs or charitable pharmacies and generate a referral or information for the patient. The care plan would then note: “Referral to [Pharmacy Assistance Program] on 7/1 – patient to apply, social worker to follow up by 7/15.” This level of integration transforms the care plan into a bridge between the medical and social realms.

Another example: Social isolation is recognized as a problem for an elderly patient, contributing to depression. The care plan might incorporate: “Community org referral: Senior Center social activities – patient will attend weekly bingo group (starting next week) to increase social interaction, daughter to facilitate transport.” Though this might seem non-medical, it is therapeutic for mental health and could improve medication adherence or overall well-being, indirectly affecting medical outcomes.

It’s important too that the care plan monitors SDOH interventions just as clinical ones. If we referred someone to a food bank, did they go? Are they now getting adequate nutrition? This might involve follow-up calls or asking the patient at the next review, and updating the plan accordingly (e.g., problem “food insecurity” resolved or improved).

On a systemic level, capturing data on SDOH and outcomes allows health systems to identify disparities and target improvements. For instance, if a care plan platform notices many patients have transportation issues, an organization might invest in a shuttle service. At the individual level, though, we ensure that for this patient, known social hurdles are being actively managed.

The holistic approach blending medical and social care is supported by global health strategies as well. The WHO’s vision of people-centred care explicitly includes “coordinating services within and across sectors” and addressing the context of people’s lives . In practice, countries with strong primary care systems often integrate social services more closely. In the U.S., initiatives like accountable health communities and Medicaid waivers encourage addressing SDOH as part of care. Some state Medicaid programs (e.g., New Jersey Medicaid) have interdisciplinary care planning requirements that include social needs – the earlier table in our Appendix suggests every major framework acknowledges SDOH’s importance.

By having a dedicated section or emphasis on SDOH, the care plan elevates these factors to the same level as, say, medications or therapies. It sends a message: treating the whole person means tackling the non-medical needs too. Vinyl Health’s platform might have features such as SDOH screening questionnaires built-in (e.g., asking about housing, food, etc.), which then automatically populate the care plan’s problem list if positive and suggest relevant community resources. For example, a positive screen for food insecurity could auto-suggest referral options to the care coordinator.

A potential innovation on the horizon is integrating social care data interoperability. Just as FHIR allows exchange of medical data, efforts are underway to standardize how social needs and services data are exchanged between healthcare and social service entities. Vinyl Health staying compliant with data standards (like Gravity Project for SDOH coding) would ensure that when a hospital or clinic records social needs, that information can travel with the patient to community organizations in a useful way.

In summary, explicitly incorporating SDOH into the care plan ensures a holistic care planning approach. It acknowledges that improving a patient’s health is not solely about prescriptions and procedures but also about ensuring they have food, housing, transportation, and social support – the basic needs that form the foundation of health. By harmonizing healthcare delivery with social care interventions, the care plan truly centers on the person, not just their diseases. This leads to more equitable care: patients who face greater social obstacles get the extra support they need, helping to reduce disparities in outcomes. Vinyl Health’s commitment to SDOH (with thorough assessment, integrated resource directories, and community linkages) positions it as a forward-thinking platform in line with the cutting edge of patient-centered care design.

10. Harnessing Technology for Harmonized and Accessible Care Plans

Technology plays a pivotal role in making harmonized care plans a reality. Without modern health IT solutions, the kind of real-time, cross-setting coordination we’ve described would be extremely difficult. Vinyl Health leverages advanced technology – from EHR integrations to mobile apps – to ensure the care plan is a living, accessible document for all involved.

One crucial aspect is interoperability: the ability for different healthcare information systems to exchange and interpret shared data. Vinyl Health adheres to recognized data exchange standards like HL7 FHIR (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources) and leverages the United States Core Data for Interoperability (USCDI) data elements . This means the platform can integrate with electronic health record systems and health information exchanges to pull in relevant information (diagnoses, meds, lab results) and push out updates to others. For example, if a hospital uses Epic, Vinyl Health can use FHIR APIs to retrieve the patient’s latest discharge summary to update the care plan problem list or interventions. Conversely, if a community provider updates something in Vinyl Health, a summary could be sent back to the primary EHR.

Epic’s Care Everywhere network demonstrates the power of interoperability at scale: in one month in 2020, more than 221 million patient records were exchanged among health systems via Care Everywhere , and notably about half of those exchanges were between Epic and non-Epic systems . This indicates broad adoption of frameworks like Carequality that allow different platforms to share data. A harmonized care plan benefits immensely from such connectivity – wherever the patient goes, the care plan can follow. Imagine a patient traveling out of state and ending up in an ER; through an HIE or network, that ER physician could access the Vinyl Health care plan, see the latest med list and goals, and even update the follow-up section before the patient returns home. “Having that complete picture” is essential for providers to do what’s right for the patient .

Another technology facet is user interface and multi-platform access. Vinyl Health prioritizes a user-friendly interface for both providers and patients . Providers need the care plan software to integrate into their workflow (e.g., within their EHR or as an easy-to-use web portal) so it isn’t seen as extra work but rather as a helpful tool. Patients and family members need an intuitive portal or app where they can readily find their care plan, perhaps broken into digestible sections (medications, upcoming tasks, etc.), and even interact (like checking off completed tasks or sending a message to the care team). Vinyl’s interface uses clear language and visual cues to highlight important information, making it more likely patients will engage with it .

Real-time updates and notifications are another technological boon. When any team member updates the plan, the others can get notified. This is analogous to collaborative document editing in other fields. For example, if the home health nurse notes edema and increases a diuretic per protocol, the primary doctor could get a prompt and the cardiologist too – avoiding a scenario where one hand doesn’t know what the other did. Notifications can be tailored (e.g. urgent ones for big changes, daily digest for minor notes). Secure messaging built into the platform allows quick clarification or discussion threads attached to the care plan items (like a comment on a goal). This level of communication saves time versus phone tag or scattered emails.

Vinyl Health also supports digital patient engagement tools. Features such as a digital patient-facing whiteboard (which might display today’s care tasks or progress toward goals), or self-paced educational modules integrated into the plan (for instance, a hyperlink in the plan that takes the patient to a video on proper inhaler use), further enhance accessibility . Patients can be prompted to input data themselves: e.g., daily blood pressure readings via a connected device, symptom check-ins via a mobile questionnaire. These patient-generated health data can feed into the plan’s monitoring section, and rules can trigger alerts if something is off (like a BP reading above threshold goes directly as an alert to the nurse).

For care plans that involve telehealth or remote monitoring, the technology integration is key. If a patient has a home glucometer that uploads readings, Vinyl Health would integrate that data stream so the care plan’s evaluation of diabetes control is always current. If there’s a telehealth visit, the provider can update the plan on the spot and it’s immediately reflected for others.

Security and privacy are also important – sharing a plan widely must be done securely. Vinyl Health uses encryption and access controls to ensure only authorized persons see the plan, and all HIPAA guidelines are followed for patient consent when including external parties (like a community org) in the information loop.

A great advantage of a digital harmonized care plan is reducing duplication. For example, Epic’s interoperability has shown that having access to outside records made treatment more seamless and efficient, especially during COVID when telehealth was prominent . Similarly, when all providers use a single plan, the patient doesn’t have to repeat their story or worry that one doctor doesn’t know what the other is doing. It’s all there. This is not just convenience; it can prevent errors (like two drugs prescribed by different doctors that interact adversely – if they share a plan, each sees the full med list).

Let’s mention some specific innovative platforms as examples of technology enabling care plan harmonization (in addition to Vinyl Health itself):

  • Epic Care Everywhere: We discussed how it enables cross-system sharing. It essentially creates a virtual unified chart for patients seen in multiple places, which is a form of harmonizing the care plan on the data level .
  • Bamboo Health: This platform (formerly PatientPing) focuses on real-time notifications and care collaboration across facilities and payers. Through tools like Pings, it sends instant alerts whenever patients have care events (ER visit, hospital admission/discharge) across its national network . It’s used by ACOs, hospitals, and health plans to ensure everyone knows where the patient is in their journey. Bamboo Health’s vision of “Real-Time Care Intelligence” is to provide “comprehensive, actionable insights to all care settings… and support holistic care during critical moments with real-time data” . By integrating such alerts, a care plan platform can dynamically update context (e.g. add “recent hospitalization” problem and plan tasks for follow-up) the moment an event occurs.
  • AlayaCare: This is a home and community care software that emphasizes an integrated care plan across multiple service lines. It breaks down silos by having everything – clinical notes, personal support services, therapy, etc. – in one platform for home-based care . They tout the visibility of seeing “the client’s whole care plan and its complexity – in one platform”, configurable to unique needs . This is a great example in the home health space where often multiple agencies and caregivers are involved. AlayaCare’s fully integrated solution, with mobile apps for field caregivers, means everyone from the nurse to the personal care aide sees the same plan and can document in it, improving consistency of care.
  • Other innovations include specialized care plan systems for specific conditions, like oncology care management platforms that connect oncologists, primary care, and patient navigators with the patient’s treatment plan and survivorship plan. Or pediatric complex care platforms that include school nurses and family in the care loop. The patterns are similar – centralize the information and give appropriate access to all contributors.

Vinyl Health essentially aims to be the central hub for the patient’s care plan, using technology as the enabler of this hub-and-spoke model. By designing for interoperability, real-time data, and user-centric interfaces, technology ensures the care plan is not a static PDF in a folder, but a responsive, interactive guide accessible 24/7. It’s the difference between a paper map that might be outdated and a live GPS that reroutes you in real time – the latter being far more useful for navigating care.

Lastly, technology can provide analytics to care teams about care plans. For instance, a dashboard might show how many goals are on track vs. not for a panel of patients, or alert managers if a certain type of intervention is frequently delayed. This helps healthcare organizations do quality improvement on their care planning processes themselves. It closes the loop by using data to refine how care plans are formulated and executed.

In summary, the cutting-edge technology incorporated in Vinyl Health and similar platforms transforms the care plan from a static document into a dynamic, shareable, and patient-engaging tool. It leverages interoperability standards to ensure the plan travels with the patient and stays updated across systems . It uses friendly UIs and multi-modal access (web, mobile) so that both professionals and patients actually use it. And it introduces automation and decision support (alerts, prompts, resource linkages) to ease the workload on providers while improving thoroughness. As healthcare continues to digitize, such platforms are increasingly indispensable – they tie together the threads of patient care into a coherent tapestry, using tech as the loom.

11. Conclusion: Towards a Future of Patient-Owned, Harmonized Care

We have explored the essential elements of a comprehensive, harmonized care plan, touching on everything from foundational data to technology integration. All these elements center around one ultimate goal: providing patient-centered, coordinated, and effective care that leads to better outcomes and experiences. Let’s briefly recap the key components of an ideal care plan and how they contribute to that vision:

  • Foundational and Demographic Information establishes the patient’s identity and basic details, ensuring that every provider is talking about the same person and can reach them when needed (the right care for the right patient).
  • Comprehensive Assessment delves into the patient’s medical conditions, mental health, functional status, cognitive abilities, nutritional state, and social factors – painting a full picture of the patient’s health and context. This holistic understanding is the canvas on which the care plan is built.
  • Patient-Centered Goal Setting ensures the care plan is driven by the individual’s own aspirations and priorities. By translating these into SMART goals, the plan gains clear direction and meaning for the patient and care team.
  • Interventions and Action Plan outline the specific steps to achieve the goals – from medical treatments and medications to education and social support – with accountability for each action. This is where intentions turn into coordinated care activities, ideally based on evidence and tailored to the person.
  • Care Team Coordination clarifies who is involved and who is doing what. With an interdisciplinary team all working off the same plan, communication is streamlined and each member’s contributions are aligned rather than fragmented.
  • Patient and Caregiver Empowerment ensures the plan respects patient autonomy, incorporates their preferences, and gives them (and their caregivers) the knowledge and tools to actively participate. A plan the patient owns is a plan more likely to succeed.
  • Continuous Evaluation and Updates keep the care plan dynamic. Through regular reviews and responsiveness to change, the plan stays effective and up-to-date, rather than becoming stale or irrelevant.
  • Integration of Social Determinants of Health brings in the broader context of the patient’s life – addressing housing, transportation, financial or other challenges by linking to community resources. This makes the care truly whole-person and helps tackle root causes of health issues.

Vinyl Health’s platform incorporates all these elements, with special attention to some critical enablers: prioritizing patient values throughout, thoroughly assessing and addressing SDOH (and connecting to community resources) , adhering to data standards like FHIR and USCDI for seamless interoperability , designing an intuitive interface to promote patient and provider engagement , and supporting the care plan’s dynamic nature with features for evaluation and updates . By doing so, Vinyl Health exemplifies what a state-of-the-art care plan platform can be.

The promise of such harmonized care plans is significant. When patients have true ownership of a single, unified care plan that all their providers and supporters share, the healthcare experience becomes more transparent and empowering for them. They no longer have to be the sole messenger between disjointed providers; instead, the system works in unison. For providers, a harmonized plan reduces redundancy, errors, and omissions – everyone can see the big picture and their part in it. For the healthcare system at large, this approach can lead to improved coordination (fewer conflicting treatments or missed follow-ups), better health outcomes (as interventions are comprehensive and adhere to best practices), and potentially lower costs (by avoiding complications, emergency visits, and readmissions through proactive management).

We stand at a point in healthcare where technology and collaborative models are making this vision achievable. However, challenges remain and there are opportunities for further innovation. Interoperability gaps still exist between some systems – continued efforts (like nationwide health information exchange frameworks) are needed to ensure any provider, not just those on certain networks, can contribute to and access a patient’s care plan. Patient engagement is not one-size-fits-all; ongoing innovation in user experience, health literacy customization, and perhaps even integration of behavioral economics or gamification could further improve patient involvement in their care plans. Analytics and AI may play a growing role: for example, predictive algorithms could suggest personalized interventions (based on data from similar patients) or alert the team to potential issues before they happen (such as identifying a patient at high risk of hospitalization and prompting a preventive action in the care plan). Ensuring that all stakeholders, including payers and community services, are seamlessly integrated is still a work in progress in many settings – policy and infrastructure will need to evolve to support this collaboration (for instance, standardized consent and data-sharing agreements to include social service providers).

Crucially, cultural change is part of the equation: clinicians must embrace collaborative care planning and share power with patients; organizations must incentivize time spent on care coordination (historically not reimbursed well); patients must be encouraged and educated to see the care plan as theirs and to speak up in its development. Early signs are positive – models like PCMH and accountable care emphasize these aspects, and payment models are slowly shifting to reward outcomes and coordination rather than volume of services.

In closing, a future where every patient has a living, patient-owned care plan that travels with them and harmonizes their care is within reach. Vinyl Health is poised to be a significant contributor to that future. By implementing the comprehensive elements outlined and continuously refining them based on feedback and outcomes, it can help lead healthcare into an era of truly connected, person-centered care. In that future, fragmentation will give way to unity: one patient, one care plan, one coordinated team. The result will be not only better health outcomes, but a more humane and supportive healthcare experience for patients and families.

The journey toward that future is well underway – and with ongoing innovation and commitment to these principles, the vision of harmonized care plans empowering every patient is likely to become standard practice in the years ahead. The end goal is a healthcare system where information flows freely, every stakeholder collaborates, and patients are in the driver’s seat of their health journey. With the groundwork laid by current standards and platforms, we are moving steadily towards that goal.

Appendix: Alignment with Standards and Opportunities for Enhancement

The comprehensive care plan elements described above are not invented in a vacuum – they align closely with recommendations and requirements from various authoritative sources and standards in healthcare. We verified that our core components are consistent with guidelines from agencies like AHRQ, professional societies, and care model standards:

  • Major care planning frameworks (AHRQ’s care coordination principles, the Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) standards, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) regulations, the Case Management Society of America (CMSA) standards, state programs like New Jersey Medicaid’s care planning requirements, etc.) all include these fundamental categories: demographics, comprehensive assessment, patient goals, interventions, care team, patient preferences, plan review, and SDOH considerations – essentially endorsing the same set of elements . In other words, the list of elements we’ve deep-dived into would earn a “Yes” checkmark across all these standards bodies as being important to a high-quality care plan.

However, a review of detailed recommendations from research and policy indicates some areas where care plan practice can be enhanced even further:

  • The American Geriatrics Society (AGS), in commenting on person-centered care planning, emphasizes having one primary or lead point of contact on the healthcare team, as well as incorporating performance measurement and quality improvement with feedback from the person and caregivers . Our care team section reflects the importance of a lead coordinator, and our continuous improvement section echoes the need for patient feedback loops – reinforcing these points aligns with geriatric and complex care best practices.
  • The Federal Register RFI (2022) on person-centered care planning for multiple chronic conditions highlights several objectives that our care plan model covers:
  • proactively identifying roles and tasks among care team members (including the patient and family)
  • coordinating care across settings with a single unified plan
  • supporting patient empowerment and shared decision-making strategies
  • documenting specific goals and monitoring progress continuously.

These align with and validate the approach we’ve outlined. It underlines that national experts are calling for exactly the kind of structured, person-centered, and collaborative care planning we are implementing.

  • AHRQ’s Integration Academy (in the context of behavioral health integration) provides very detailed lists of elements for shared care plans, such as including specific behavioral health measurements, relapse prevention plans, etc. This suggests that for specialized contexts (like integrated mental health), we can expand the granularity of our care plan elements. For example, including a crisis plan for a patient with severe mental illness, or tracking behavioral health outcomes (PHQ-9 for depression) as part of the goals. We’ve covered mental health and contingency plans in general, but specialized templates for certain populations could further strengthen care plan utility.

These insights point to opportunities for innovation and improvement beyond what many current care plans do:

  • Quality Improvement Integration: Build functionality that not only sets goals, but also tracks performance metrics (both clinical and patient-experience) and feeds that data back to care teams in an actionable way. For instance, a dashboard for a clinic showing the percentage of their care plan patients who have met key goals, or who have up-to-date plans, fostering continuous quality improvement.
  • Advanced Roles & Workflow: Ensure every care plan has a clearly identified lead coordinator and that this role is maintained (e.g., if that person changes jobs, someone else is assigned). Also, further formalize shared decision-making protocols – perhaps by embedding decision aids in the care plan workflow for certain tough choices (like initiating dialysis or not).
  • Personalization for Special Populations: Adapt the care plan structure for specific needs – pediatrics (including school and developmental info), oncology (treatment protocols and survivorship plans), behavioral health (crisis plans, therapy goals), etc. This means creating modular additions to the core plan for these scenarios.
  • Better Patient Engagement Tools: While we stress accessible language and portals, we can innovate with things like patient-held health records (on smartphone), voice-interactive care plans (for patients with low literacy or vision issues, the plan could be voice-navigated via virtual assistant), and culturally tailored materials. Not all patients engage with written plans; some might respond to a video summary of their care plan or an interactive text-messaging plan. Experimenting and researching what best helps patients take ownership will be important.
  • Interoperability on a broader scale: Continue to push the envelope on data sharing. For example, integration with national health information networks under the upcoming TEFCA could allow Vinyl Health to retrieve or share care plan data nationwide, beyond specific EHR vendor networks. Also, working with the Gravity Project to standardize SDOH data sharing will ensure community referrals and outcomes can loop back into the plan.
  • Artificial Intelligence Support: Use AI to analyze large amounts of care plan data and suggest optimizations. An AI could flag, for example, that a patient’s multiple goals might be overwhelming and suggest focusing on a critical few, or detect that an intervention hasn’t had the expected effect and propose an evidence-based alternative. AI could also help personalize education materials by learning how a patient best learns (maybe the patient always opens videos but not PDFs – the AI suggests video education).
  • Monitoring and Remote Tech: As wearable and home monitoring tech grows, incorporate that data in meaningful ways. Perhaps the care plan evolves to include a real-time health status section fed by devices (weight, blood sugar, etc.), and thresholds in the plan automatically alert or even adjust certain aspects (with clinician oversight). This kind of closed-loop system is emerging in areas like diabetes (e.g., insulin pumps adjusting doses). Extending similar principles to broader care plan management could be transformative.

In essence, while the foundational structure of our care plan model is sound and in line with today’s standards, the journey of improving care plans is ongoing. By staying attuned to guidelines, research, and stakeholder feedback, we can continue to refine the care plan elements and their implementation. Vinyl Health is committed to this continuous evolution – incorporating new best practices as they emerge and listening to input from patients, providers, payers, and others to close any gaps.

By doing so, we ensure that the care plan is not just a static checklist meeting minimum requirements, but a robust, living instrument that truly supports patient-centered, harmonized care at the cutting edge of quality. The alignment with standards gives us confidence that we’re on the right track, and the identified opportunities give us a roadmap for where to innovate next.


Works Cited

  1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ).Care Coordination Measures Atlas Version 4.0. 2014.https://www.ahrq.gov/ncepcr/care/coordination/atlas.html 
  2. AHRQ.Defining the PCMH (Patient-Centered Medical Home).https://pcmh.ahrq.gov/page/defining-pcmh 
  3. American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP). “Screening for Social Determinants of Health in Daily Practice.”Family Practice Management, Nov/Dec 2018.https://www.aafp.org/pubs/fpm/issues/2018/1100/p10.html 
  4. American Geriatrics Society Expert Panel on Person-Centered Care. “Person-Centered Care: A Definition and Essential Elements.”Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 64, no. 1, 2016, pp. 15–18.https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.13866 
  5. Bamboo Health.Bamboo Health Publishes 2021 Annual Impact Report. Feb 2022.https://www.bamboohealth.com/resources/bamboo-health-2021-annual-impact-report/ 
  6. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). “Chronic Care Management Services.”Medicare Learning Network, 2023.https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/Downloads/ChronicCareManagement.pdf 
  7. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP).https://www.cms.gov/medicare/medicare-fee-for-service-payment/acuteinpatientpps/readmissions-reduction-program 
  8. Epic Systems Corporation. “Care Everywhere: Connecting with Outside Organizations.”Epic UserWeb, 2020.https://www.epic.com/software#CareEverywhere 
  9. Federal Register. “Request for Information on Person-Centered Care Planning for Multiple Chronic Conditions.” Vol. 87, No. 85. May 2022.https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/05/04/2022-09428/request-for-information-on-person-centered-care-planning 
  10. Gravity Project.FHIR Implementation Guide for SDOH Clinical Care. HL7.https://www.hl7.org/gravity 
  11. Healthcare IT News. “Epic’s Care Everywhere Interoperability Platform Shows Big Jump in Data Exchange.” Sept 2020.https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/epics-care-everywhere-interoperability-platform-shows-big-jump-data-exchange 
  12. National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA).Patient-Centered Medical Home Standards and Guidelines. 2021.https://www.ncqa.org/programs/health-care-providers-practices/patient-centered-medical-home-pcmh/ 
  13. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). “Engaging Patients in Their Care: A Path to Improved Outcomes.” 2020. https://www.pcori.org
  14. ThoroughCare. “SMART Goals: A Collaborative and Patient-Centered Approach to Health.”ThoroughCare Blog, 2023.https://www.thoroughcare.net/blog/smart-goals-a-collaborative-and-patient-centered-approach-to-health 
  15. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).Healthy People 2030: Social Determinants of Health.https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/social-determinants-health 
  16. Unite Us. “Building Connected Communities of Care.” https://uniteus.com
  17. United States Core Data for Interoperability (USCDI).ONC Health IT Standards.https://www.healthit.gov/isa/united-states-core-data-interoperability-uscdi 
  18. Vinyl Health Internal Design Documentation.Care Plan Platform Architecture & Feature Set. (Confidential, 2024).
  19. World Health Organization (WHO).Framework on Integrated, People-Centred Health Services. 2016. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/255311